INCOME INEQUALITY (the next big thing)

INCOME INEQUALITY: Let us watch as this phrase gathers momentum.  It is like being present at the birth of “Global Warming”.  We are hushed in awe. Before us silently spinning, a vast sphere of gas about to reach critical mass.  Fusion is initiated… a Star is born!  And we are witnessing it!
Rather than “wasting” time on proving that this is indeed both a problem and one that is within the government’s purview we get the bum’s rush to find a solution.  We must not allow ourselves to be stampeded into accepting this premise.  Income Inequality is merely a statistical construction.  Like “the economy” it has no independent actual existence.

Why is it taken as a given that INCOME INEQUALITY is a problem? Maybe a society’s level of income disparity is directly related to a higher standard of living among the poorest members?   Is this untrue?  Or is it true?  I do not know.  But, I suspect that those who rile about INCOME INEQUALITY are equally in the dark.
Since they do not know whether or not INCOME DISPARITY results in a higher standard of living for the poorest members of society or not, to what may we attribute their commitment to lowering this inequality?  The fact of the matter is that the well being of the poorest members of society is not even considered by “big-hearted” egalitarians.  Even if the poorest people in this country have a standard of living the envy of most of the world’s middle classes, the elite are unmoved.
From private Pre-K to private school to Ivy League the elite and their wannabes have been indoctucated to a state of conditioned response that would impress a BF Skinner: Inequality bad; equality good.  Inequality is in and of itself “bad”.  But why?
The Post Modern Elitist has learned the clever rhetorical device of placing their premise as a condition in a “problem” they seek to “correct”.  Like “what to do about Global Warming?”  To even begin an answer is to accept the premise.  This is why the Climate Gangsters always bring in “green jobs” to their rhetoric.  Once the rube rises to debate the economic benefits of “green shoots” he has acceded to the premise that man-made global warming is a reality, and that it is a crisis.
Their minds have been filled from birth with the premise that equality is the sine quo none of justice.   Talking about how to “manage” income inequality, no matter the proffered cure, whether “market based” or through government intervention accedes to the premise that Income Inequality is a problem, and a critical one at that.

To whom is Income Inequality a problem?  Certainly it is not to the wealthy.  The poor would surely prefer more wealth rather than income equality.  The evil is to convince the poor that they are poor because others are too wealthy.  This will not help the poor.  Every single attempt at creating a Utopian cornucopia of equality has resulted in the same sad totalitarian state.  Is it the Middle Class that would benefit from the lessening of Income Inequality?  That is the most ridiculous proposition of all!  The Middle Class nearly by definition is the class aspiring to become wealthy.  It is the Middle Class that the elites seek to destroy.  Historically the Bourgeoisie (the Marxist term for Middle Class) is the only new thing under the Sun.  It arose in the interstices of feudal society.  It prospered by diligent effort, thrifty habits, sobriety and those family values based upon particular religious values. Merchants, artisans and professionals created wealth.  For the first time in human history the Land Holders lost their monopoly over the production of wealth.  Capital came to compete with Land.  The rise of The Modern world lay in this conflict and its resolution.

What we see now is the end of the trajectory of that unique occurrence in history, the Middle Class and its republican form of government.  Who prospers when Income Inequality is attacked?  Not the wealthy, the poor or middle class, but only the Political Class will prosper.   They use the Poor both as a threat to bring violence upon the Middle Class and as numbers to win elections.  The Political Class is the final incarnation of the Princes and the Priests.  Once Income Inequality becomes an established “issue” upon which the State has an interest, all manner of economic decisions come under the control of Politics.  When every decision is a political one, Totalitarianism is present.
Let us never, not once engage in any discussions on how best to “solve” INCOME INEQUALITY.  We need be ever mindful that to do so is to accept its legitimacy as a political issue.

The American Rightists are Anachronistic Oxymorons

Yes, The Current Regime is evil. Yes the Globalists are deliberately destroying US sovereignty.  BUT if possible, this Nazi bullshit is even worse. Have you read the link?
Here is the first two sentences: “The dream of a White Homeland in which our people, principles, and Traditions can survive and thrive has long been the suggested solution to the growing multicultural nightmare that is facing White America. Simply opting out of the System would allow White nationalists, Traditionalists, Christian fundamentalists, National Socialists, Patriot groups, militias, and everyone in between to finally have a piece of land to call their own; land that is not owned by the capitalists and the forces of International Jewry.
THE ERROR in his thinking and in this statement is that Capitalism is Jewish, or necessarily International. It is of the same mentality of all the Roman Catholic European Would-Be Hegemons. In truth the term RIGHT WING has no actual American history. “RIGHT WING” is a Continental European phenomenon first named in the wake of the French Revolution.
Continental Europe had resisted the capitalist middleclass evolution that occurred in Britain (and to a large degree in the Netherlands). The French Monarchy stood on increasingly shaky ground as the Modern Age began its overthrow of Landed Aristocracy. The British Civil Wars a century earlier had inoculated the isles by already acknowledging the new economic reality in which Capital replaced Land as the major source of power.
The development of the Middle Class, i.e. the Bourgeoise occurred in the latter Middle Ages. (The towns, or burgs, is the source of the term Bourgeoise.) The “Bourgeoise” or Middle Class refers to townsfolk who were neither peasants nor priests nor princes.
They were the craftsmen, merchants and professionals. As the value of their produce rose so too did their wealth. They emerged mostly in in northwestern Europe in areas where Reformed Protestantism had overthrown the Roman establishment. The traits of sobriety, industry and thrift that are summarily referred to as the Protestant Work Ethic were in reality not limited to Protestants. Jews, and Catholics also moved out of the agricultural workforce and into growing towns and cities. There, capital accumulated and the aristocrats and royals, and bishops and priests had to come hat in hand to borrow from the surplus capital acquired through industriousness.
In the final crisis of France, the King summoned the Estates General to raise revenue. However at this point the Bourgeoise were not amenable to raising taxation upon themselves while still being discriminated against by reason of their non-aristocratic blood lines. The Revolution in France was launched by the Middle Class. However, unlike America’s it became under the control of demonic philosophers like Rousseau, and took on a deadly anti-clerical anti-Church and anti-aristo as well as anti-Royalist tendencies.
The rampage against the Catholic Church by the French Revolution in France and throughout Europe in the wake of Napoleonic expansion created a reaction that was pro-Catholic, pro-Landed Aristocrat, pro-Royalist. This is the Right Wing.
It has no analogy in Anglo-American history. Our Revolutions ( the British Civil War, the American Revolution, and the American Civil War) were all movements towards the Modern Age. The Euro-Right as in Franco and Mussolini and finally Hitler sought to restore the Pre-Modern pattern of power. Though the latter two (Mussolini and Hitler) called themselves Revolutionary they were really throwbacks to an imagined Pre-Modern Age.
Blaming the ills of the Post-Modern America on “Capitalist Jewry” is quite incorrect. If the Nazis had there way they would return to a Pre-Modern age. However there is no Pre-Modern America! America is the nation born of the Modern Age and with Great Britain, the cause of the Modern Age throughout the world. The only true revolution in all human history was the Middleclass Capitalist Revolution that occurred in Britain and Northwestern Europe. The restoration of the American Constitution with its Modernist principles represents the only path back to the original American ideals. Since America IS the Modern, these Nazis cannot restore a pre-modern order that NEVER WAS.  The middleclass Is American, and America is the Middleclass.

Yahoo: Nausea Journalism
YAHOO carries a story from “Reuters” by a Nicholas Wapshott.  It is one of those articles that is so wrong on so many levels that one wonders where to begin.  Here is the lead off paragraph to set the tone.

“Moderate Republicans cannot fathom what has happened to their party.
Once a happy band of no-nonsense, pro-business conservatives, cautious in everything from money to marriage — including their wary response to the onward march of 1960s liberal social values — they were prepared, within reason, to trim their policies to match the voters’ mood. After all, to achieve anything in government you first have to win elections.”  

Wapshott of the Glib & Facile School of Journalism misses the “good ol’ boy” finger-to-the-wind, say-anything, promise-everything party of his woozy memory; a Golden Age of Blue Blooded Northeastern Republicans conning Midwestern Bible-reading simpletons into supporting low corporate taxes in return for Mom, Apple Pie, and family farm subsidies.  Wapshott sees both “regressive” groups as body-checking the forward rush to Post-Modern America.  “Unfair!” he subliminally whines, they were already labeled and filed under the appropriate headings (Racist, Misogynist, Homophobic, Plutocratic etc. etc.)  How dare they engage in Evolution (which must be taught as dogma in the schools!)?
Republicans puzzled by the rise of dogma and division in their party” begins Nicholas in his empathic embrace of the poor little rich party that was.  Somehow the “wary response” to the cultural revolution that broke out in The Sixties has been forgiven, and is no longer dogmatic nor divisive?
After several paragraphs “proving” that “radical conservatives” in the Party have been soundly defeated whether in Primaries or in the General Election citing of course “Mr. Republican” Barry Goldwater, he reluctantly turns towards “the likeable Ronald Reagan, who put a Hollywood gloss on ultra-conservatism. Once in the White House, the former California governor turned out to be more amenable to horse-trading than his obdurate campaign rhetoric suggested.”  So in fact Reagan was merely a tepid moderate playing a role as an ultra-conservative principled leader.  Hmm, the clever grad of the G & F School of Journalism sure has “unpacked” RR.  (Not.)
Now the author cuts to his point.  All the above was written to distinguish the past with the current “GOP base, who demand no compromises, no bargaining in Congress, no tax rises, no politics as usual“.  To accuse us, The Tea Party “and the libertarian wing” of the GOP as obdurate and unwilling to compromise principle is meant to be damning!  But, he is so molded by Newthink that standing on principle, to him, is a ludicrous posture taken by a naif, and not the mark of a serious “player”.  Mr. Wapshott seems to enjoy believing that we who identify with the Tea Party are unaware of the role of compromise in the art of politics.  This is not so, however.
I have not been aware of any sense of intransigence among the Tea Party or our more libertarian brothers.  What the author calls obduracy and intransigence was merely our making recourse to the single branch of Government in our hands.  The Left (let us quit the charade, the modern Democratic Party is socialist and authoritarian) controls the White House and the Federal Bureaucracy and the Senate.  The Supreme Court has become unmoored from The Constitution and its rulings are not predictable, nor based on any underlying rationale.  (The finding that the fine for not purchasing Federally approved health insurance is in actuality not a fine but a tax is in and of itself proof enough!)  The only means at hand to halt the steamroller of ObamaCare was seen as the House of Representatives and specifically its power of the purse.  The House Republicans who refused to pass a continuing resolution without some relief from the Affordable Care Act were not stamping their feet and holding their breath over a triviality.  In fact, in the weeks following the surrender and the passage of the “clean” Continuing Resolution to fund the Government, the roll out of the ObamaCare Program was so chaotic that it seems as many Leftists are seeking to delay the deadline for registering as well as Conservatives.  This proves that the House’s motives were serious enough to warrant the exercise of its power to block spending.  Thus it paints their decision as pragmatic and not dogmatic!

Next Mr. W goes on to lecture us on the proper role of government in a republic and his take on liberty.  “Even before the crash of 2008 and the 2009 fiscal stimulus that ignited the Tea Party, libertarians had begun infiltrating the Republican Party. Their emphasis is a belief that the problem with almost everything is the government — or what everyone else calls the democratic will of the people.”  Libertarians infiltrated (like Viet Cong, or Al Qaida?) the GOP.  Here is the nub of the article that so irritated me.  He equates libertarian ideals with skepticism of governments’ motives and ability.  This is a weak definition.  Until Journalism Schools began their export of priestly interpreters of the signs of the times most Americans had a healthy distrust of Government.  This was the bare minimum of good citizenship.  A libertarian of course distrusts government.  But what the Journalist fails to recognize is that libertarians trust individual human beings.  Or to be more exact, libertarians trust other individuals who are rational agents who legally and morally go about seeking to better themselves.  We trust that humans guided by morals and rational self-interest will create self-assembling societies.  Notice how the author describes the antithesis of liberty: the democratic will of the people!
As the woman screeched “That man was right!” this man too, is right!  The “democratic will of the people” is the false idol created by despots and tyrants since the dawn of time.  Elections do not create or diminish rights.  Majority-based laws are valid only within the very circumscribed area into which we have delegated some of our personal sovereignty.  The Democratic Will of The People has no legitimate business inside my property, with my person. or with my property.  If no single individual has the right to take that which is mine, or force me to do that which I loath, then a majority of them have no greater right.  Zero times N is zero. They apparently do not cover algebra at the G & F School of Journalism.
Next, he takes a look at the schisms within the Party on wedge issues, i.e. abortion, gay marriage, euthanasia, and legalization of  marijuana.  He discovers large differences on these issues between those who identify themselves as libertarian versus those who would call themselves Tea Party supporters, and asks “So where does this leave moderate Republicans?”

What the author cannot understand is that mature adults can seek common-ground in important matters and agree to disagree on others.  Unlike the Democratic Party with its rigid Stalinist conformity and talking points, the Republican Party retains the qualities of individuality.  The alleged differences in approach to the above listed wedge issues vanishes when both libertarian and Tea Party republicans look to restore government to its proper place. Both groups dislike the arrogance of government.  Many Tea Party folks who stand against Gay Marriage, and other social issues do so because they rightly perceive that special interest groups are using the coercive power of government to change society.  The commonality of all but the tepid Chamber of Commerce cadre will stand together to resist the Leftist conceit that the government stands above Society.  The Republican essence is that societies have governments but not the reverse: Governments do not have societies! 

Walesa Still Wily, “Poland and Germany should unite, says Lech Walesa”

Not a bad idea. Poland as an independent entity has been the exception rather than the rule historically. Until WW1 it was divided amongst the Austro-Hungarian, German and Russian Empires. Its brief emergence between the World Wars was as an authoritarian dictatorship, aggressively attacking Revolutionary Russia in the east, and belligerently refusing to negotiate any solution to the legitimate issue of Danzig, (Gdansk). That belligerency (unfortunately reinforced by Britain’s war guarantee) ignited WW2. 
The destruction of Poland by Nazi Germany was followed by its conquest by the USSR. 
Lech Walesa played a key role in bringing down Soviet hegemony over central Europe. But he is an astute man. He sees the writing on the wall. Gone are the days of Thatcher and Reagan and Pope John Paul II. Russia resurgent under Putin threatens Poland. NATO guarantees are no longer trusted. Poland merging with Germany would present a self-contained front to face Russia. He is very, very smart. But the proud Poles will never go for this. Alas.Image

Naval Confrontation, WW1 + 99 Years

*Russia tells U.S. how Syria plan will go down..
*Iran to U.S.: ‘We will destroy your world’…
*Russia’s ‘carrier-killer’ enters Mediterranean…
SUDDENLY OBAMA’S WEAKNESS HAS BROUGHT THE REAL CRISIS. Putin’s actions have been such that America MUST fully protest and reinforce the Eastern Med or retreat across the Atlantic.
IF PUTIN is arming Iran and bringing its “Carrier-killer” into the Mediterranean, it is crossing into extremely dangerous waters. This “Killer” would necessarily have to be destroyed immediately upon any hostilities: even upon the strong chance of hostilities.
The USN must bring a destroyer and an attack sub to within range of Russian electronics, they must be allowed to know they are there. And of course multiple weapons systems must be targeting this ship at all times.
99 years ago last month the calculus of timetables ignited WW1. Russian mobilization required more time than the other European Powers. The Czar believed that because of that he had to start his mobilization at the first hint of war with Austro-Hungary and Germany. As Russia mobilized Germany had no choice but to begin her mobilization. At German mobilization France had no choice but begin hers. This was a slow motion but relentless fuse. With guided missile “Carrier-Killers” in the Med, the same calculus applies but one on crack.
To the America-bashers of Conspiracy Land: You all have become unrealistically enamored of Putin. Because he stands against the West Inc. you look up to him. However, recall he is a KGB man. If Russia is allowed to overawe the US Navy in the Med, we will be forced to retreat perhaps to Britain. Israel and Western Europe will have to make their necessary arrangements and deal with a Russian dominated Med.
NATO will be as destroyed, as the Warsaw Pact. The Suez would come under Russian domination.
I have long felt the Carriers are like the battleships of WW2: obsolete. The Falklands War should have put the US Navy on notice that the age of the Super Carrier Task Force has passed. Perhaps they were good for overawing developing nations, but if real war with China or Russia (even Iran) came, a barrage of anti-Ship missiles could destroy a several billion dollar system and kill thousands of sailors.
With B1 and B2 Stealth bombers capable of flying from Oklahoma to any target in the world and back, the need for local airfields is past. A Carrier Task force is just a hugely expensive airfield at sea.
The USN like militaries in general, are always preparing to fight the last war; especially if that war was on the scale and grandeur of the Pacific War. We have lost our industrial heart. We will NOT be able to absorb the first blow, and bounce back with massive output of new ships as we did in 1941- 45. A Chinese/Russian missile attack on US Carrier Groups would be Pearl Harbor times millions. We would be forced to go nuclear or retreat to North America while the rest of the world would be brought under Sino-Russian power. Perhaps the EU would be forced to accommodate itself into the new world. In that case we would also face a Germany rapidly re-arming, along with the rest of the world’s resources being mobilized against us.
Suddenly Syria is very unimportant.


This, the “other side” of Adolf Hitler is presented in a 24 minute video filled with lies, half-truths and innuendos lacking any documentation.  The anonymity of the Web has encouraged the posting of vile anti-Semitic comments and images.  There appears to be a new freedom to be publicly anti-Semitic, a trait that since the Holocaust has been socially frowned upon.   I believe the new freedom to resume Jew-hatred is directly related to the increasing anti-Zionist rhetoric of the Muslims in Europe, and their Leftist allies. 
Ironically it is the New Left that has boldly presumed to disconnect anti-Zionism from anti-Semitism.  It is not “The Jews” who are the problem but the Zionists.  The racialist industry using claims of racism to silence opposition has been taken to its logical limit by the election of the Black President, and his appointment of a Black Attorney General.   The Zimmerman Trial finally let loose the pent up anger at a media that excuses black cultural pathology.  The fact of an Obama Presidency has absolved many whites from accepting any further checks written on the Slavery Accounts.  They will no longer honor any further demands; and they will no longer refrain from speaking the truth about black urban culture.  The openness of the new anti-Semitism appears to have a similar etiology.
The acceptance of Israel in the world, and the lack of recent invasions from its neighbors have gradually eroded its perception in the west as the plucky underdog.  The mantle of “Underdog” has been successfully removed from Israel and given the Palestinians.  The Left with its reflexive disdain for nationalism, and its intrinsic atheism has come to loath Zionism.  Menachim Begin snapped the historic link between socialism and Zionism. The “Right” which also saw Israel as a kindred society in the Middle East has been moving into opposition of the Globalist Agenda.  The International Conspiracy, which is in fact a reality, has re-awakened the dormant “International Jewry” meme. Israel, leads the world in condemnations leveled against any nation by the Globalist enterprise par excellence, the UN. Nevertheless the meme of “Jewish International Banking” has been resurrected.  The anti-NWO theorists have broken with their formerly Neo-Con point of view.  American Patriots have become convinced that the US Government is operating not for the benefit of Americans, but for the implementation of The New World Order. From being supporters of US strength in the world we have come to see that the Government has been usurped and its resources are being put to some mysterious purpose.  The anti-Zionist “knows” it is Israel pulling the strings. Israel is depicted as a bloodsucking spider in the center of a web of treachery; an update of the Rothschild cartoon.  The Left and the Right agree only on disdain for Israel!
What is a Jew who supports Israel and sees the gathering One World Power as an implacable foe of the State of Israel and of America to do?   The anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism and brutal Jew-hatred cannot be ignored.  But neither may the rapid rise of a Supranational North America-EU-Japan axis (NATO Plus) be dismissed. 
We must be willing to stand with the anti-Globalists yet let no Jewish libels go unanswered.

The previous paragraphs were in response to me receiving a link to the video, above, by way of a reply to a comment I made on some blog or another. 

The video is brief, less than 25 minutes.  It is superficially of decent production though spelling errors detract from any sense of real professionalism.  The narrator is speaking English with a German accent. Why that would be thought important is beyond me. 

It begins, as do all things Hitler, with Versailles. 
The unfair Reparations: The film underplays the fact that Prussia demanded 5 Billion Gold francs from France over five years during which period of time German forces occupied parts of France.  It also made no mention of the onerous terms dictated by the Germans upon the Russians at Brest-Livosk.  The Russian Empire collapsed in the course of World War I.  The victorious Germans imposed a six billion marks reparation upon the defeated Russians.  Wiki: “The treaty stated that “Germany and Austria-Hungary intend to determine the future fate of these territories in agreement with their populations.” Most of these territories were in effect ceded to Germany, which intended to have them become economic and political dependencies. The many ethnic German residents (volksdeutsch) would be the ruling elite. Two new monarchies were created: in Lithuania, and in Latvia and Estonia; German aristocrats were appointed as rulers.” – Territorial_cessions_in_eastern_Europe

The inter-war economic turmoil of the entire world and especially Germany is linked by this video to “Large Jewish banks” which loaned money to the Weimar Republic.  Then the “Jewish-Anglo-American” interests deliberately removed the Gold Standard in order to create the hyperinflation that wiped out German savings and jobs.  Yet hyperinflation also serves to drastically cut the value of loans.  If the “Jew Banks” loaned marks when they were worth some given value, but were to be repaid in worthless currency that does not sound particularly shrewd. 

At the 9 minute and 47 seconds mark we learn that it was the Jews of Germany that set out to destroy the upstanding morals of Germanic folk through homosexual clubs, movies, adultery and S&M shows.  Of course no documentation is given.  And there were Jewish pamphlets ridiculing Jesus.  But, for what reasons are homosexuality and adultery taboo in German society?  Were they taboo under Odin and Thor?  They sacrificed humans to these “gods”.  But no, the German sense of sexual morality is derived from the Jews and the Torah.  If not for Jews those practices would perhaps be normative? 
The police were “frustrated” by Constitutional restrictions on their freedom to enforce their high moral standards.  (Many of these police became Nazis.  And as Nazis, they became Gestapo.  The narrating Kraut has the chutzpah to claim they were frustrated moral guardians!)
Much is made by the assertion that “Jews Declared Economic War On Germany”.  They cite an obviously Socialist English newspaper called “A Daily Express” from March 24, 1933.   “I run the paper for the purpose of making propaganda and with no other motive”.[6]quoted Lord Beaverbrook. “During the late thirties, the paper was a strong advocate of the appeasement policies of the Chamberlain government, due to the direct influence of its owner Lord Beaverbrook.”[3]
What about the Declaration of War upon Germany by “Judea”? 
The video seems only interested in Beaverbrook’s headline.  But here is the whole text: 

Full text of news story:

  Daily Express. London, March 24, 1933, pp. 1-2.

  J U D E A   D E C L A R E S   W A R   O N   G E R M A N Y 

  [A composite photo with Hitler before a presumably Jewish court] 




  “Daily Express” Special Political Correspondent. 

  A strange and unforeseen sequel has emerged from the stories of 
  German Jew-baiting.

  The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare
  an economic and financial war on Germany.

  Hitherto the cry has gone up: “Germany is persecuting the Jews.”
  If the present plans are carried out, the Hitlerite cry will be: 
  “The Jews are persecuting Germany.” 

    All Israel is rising in wrath against the Nazi onslaught on 
    the Jews. Adolf Hitler, swept into power by an appeal of 
    elemental patriotism, is making history of a kind he least 
    expected. Thinking to unite only the German nation to race 
    consciousness, he has roused the whole Jewish people to 
    national renascence.

  The appearance of the Swastika symbol of a new Germany has 
  called forth the Lion of Judah, the old battle symbol of 
  Jewish defiance. 

  Fourteen million Jews, dispersed throughout the world, have 
  banded together as one man to declare war on the German 
  persecutors of their co-religionists. Sectional differences 
  and antagonisms 

  [strip-shaped drawing with alternating swastikas and lions] 

  have been submerged in one common aim – to stand by the 
  600,000 Jews of Germany who are terrorised by Hitlerite 
  anti-Semitism and to compel Fascist Germany to end its 
  campaign of violence and suppression directed against its 
  Jewish minority. 

  P l a n s   F o r   A c t i o n   M a t u r i n g 

                      I n   E u r o p e   A n d   A m e r i c a

  World Jewry has made up its mind not to rest quiescent in 
  face of this revival of medieval Jew-baiting. 

  Germany may be called on to pay a heavy price for Hitler’s 
  antagonism to the Jews. She is faced with an international 
  boycott in commerce, finance, and industry. 

  The Jewish merchant prince is leaving his counting-house, 
  the banker his board-room, the shopkeeper his store, and 
  the pedlar his humble barrow, to join together in what has 
  become a holy war to combat the Hitlerite enemies of the Jew. 

  Plans for concerted Jewish action are being matured in Europe 
  and America to strike back in reprisal at Hitlerite Germany. 

  In London, New York, Paris, and Warsaw Jewish merchants are 
  waiting for a commercial crusade. 

  Resolutions are being taken throughout the Jewish business 
  B R I T I S H   J E W S   P R O T E S T   
        A T   N A Z I   T A C T I C S 



  world to sever trade relations with Germany. 

  Large numbers of merchants in London have resolved to stop 
  buying German goods, even at the cost of suffering heavy loss. 

  A meeting of the Jewish textile trade in London has been called 
  for Monday to consider the situation and to determine what steps 
  should be taken. 

  Germany is a heavy borrower in foreign money markets, where 
  Jewish influence is considerable. Continued anti-Semitism in 
  Germany is likely to react seriously against her. A move is on 
  foot on the part of Jewish financiers to exert pressure to force 
  anti-Jewish action to stop. 

  The Organisation of Jewish Youth in Britain are organizing 
  demonstrations in London and the provinces during the weekend. 

  The Board of Deputies of British Jews, representing the entire 
  Jewish community of Great Britain, are meeting in special 
  session on Sunday to discuss the German situation, and to decide 
  on what action should be taken to counteract the attacks on 
  their German fellow-Jews. 

  World-wide preparations are being made to organise demonstrations 
  of protest. 


  A concerted boycott by Jewish buyers is likely to involve grave 
  damage to the German export trade. Jewish merchants all over the 
  world are large buyers of German manufactured goods, chiefly 
  cotton goods, silks, toys, electrical fittings, and furniture. 

  In Poland, the trade embargo on Germany is already in operation. 
  In France, a proposed ban on German imports is being widely 
  canvassed in Jewish circles. 

  German Transatlantic shipping traffic is likewise threatened. 
  The Bremen and the Europa, the German crack liners, may suffer 
  heavily from a Jewish anti-German boycott. Jewish trans-ocean 
  travellers form an important part of the patrons of these liners 
  because of their extensive part in international trade. The loss 
  of their patronage would be a heavy blow to Germany’s Atlantic 

  In New York yesterday 10,000 Jewish ex-soldiers marched to the 
  City Hall to hold a protest demonstration. 

  Large crowds watched the men, some of whom wore old British 
  uniforms, petition the mayor to support them in a boycott of 
  German goods. 

  Another petition was handed in at the British Consulate-General 
  requesting that Palestine should receive refugees from Germany 
  without restriction. 

  Members of the American House of Representatives are introducing 
  resolutions protesting against the anti-Jewish excesses in 
  Germany. The American trade unions, representing 3,000,000 
  workers, have also decided to join in the protest. 

  A rabbinical decree in New York has made the next Monday a day 
  of fasting and prayer over the Hitler campaign. 

  Fasting will begin on Sunday at sunset and finish at sunset on 

  All Jewish shops in New York will be closed on Monday during a 

  Apart from a monster meeting in Madison-square Garden, meetings 
  are to be held in 300 American cities. 

  Madison-square Garden will see the remarkable sight of Bishop
  Manning speaking from a Jewish platform appealing for an end of 
  the Hitler “terror.” 


  It had been arranged to charge a shilling admission and 5 s. 
  for box seats, but a public-spirited Jew, Frank Cohen, an 
  insurance broker, gove [sic] a personal cheque for L 1,000 to 
  cover all expenses, so admission will be free. 

  Every rabbi in the city of New York has been placed under a 
  sacred obligation by rabbinical decree to devote Saturday’s 
  sermon to the plight of Jews in Germany. 

  Representative Jewish organisations in the European capitals 
  are understood to be making representations to their various 
  Governments to use influence with the Hitler Cabinet to induce 
  it to call a halt in the oppression of the German Jews. 

  The old and reunited people of Israel are rising with new 
  and modern weapons to fight their age-old battle with their 

The video obscenely seeks to portray the response to Aryan Supremacy as if it were the cause!  Further, a boycott implies the cessation of otherwise profitable trade.  (A boycott against things lacking value is an oxymoron.)  Therefore the “money” slavers, the Jews were forgoing profits!  But.. they are not supposed to do that sort of thing. 

It goes on.  A simple arithmetical error involves the statement that the Jews of Germany were 500,000 in a population of 60 million.  The video makes that to be 2%.  I get 0.83%, i.e. less than 1%!!  But this tiny number was represented way out of proportion in ranks of Professionals, Media, Lawyers, Physicians etc.  The same types who cite this garbage would point out that claims that it is racism alone that results in blacks being under-represented in professions today in America, is patently a false argument. 
The phenomenon was not related to Germany.  See Wiki: The Nobel Prize is an annual, international prize first awarded in 1901 for achievements in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, and Peace. An associated prize in Economics has been awarded since 1969.[1] Nobel Prizes have been awarded to 835 individuals,[2] of whom at least 20% were Jews, although Jews comprise less than 0.2% of the world’s population.[3]  And this is due to some Jewish conspiracy?  Do they really believe that? 

Kristalnacht is glossed over with no explanation whatsoever.  
At 16:15 homage is paid Hitler for taking Germany off the Gold Standard.  This just a few minutes after blaming
the Jew-Anglo-American bankers for that travesty! 

We learn that the number “Six Million” as in six million Jews killed by Nazis is counter-propaganda.  Hitler reduced German unemployment by six million.  This “fact” had to be hidden under a false holocaust number.  AS if in 1945 when the Death camps were liberated anyone was much interested in Hitler’s unemployment record!

The wonders of Nazi labor follow.  The marvelous cruises for workers were indeed a nice touch… for propaganda.  The video claims that the British did not allow them into ports for fear of British labor demanding the same.  However, it was Nazi policy to forbid any excursions from the ship, except in Fascist Portugal, Spain and Italy!  

The marvelous cruise ship, the Wilhelm Gustloff was sunk by “Soviet Jews” we are informed.  However the video would allow one to think that Jews deliberately sank a pleasure cruise!  The truth is that a Soviet submarine sank it in the last days of WW2.  It indeed was a tragedy in that it was filled to the rafters with German refugees from the east fleeing ahead of the Red Army.  But, it also was primarily a mission for the evacuation of German military units to continue the fight further west.  The ship carried anti-aircraft guns and was just one of many, many ships sunk in WW2 by subs.  Far and away the German subs dealt more civilian death and destruction than other submarine services in the war. 

This is a ludicrous video.  It is very unsettling that it has a large audience that accepts its half-truths, and lies as gospel.  Only someone already infected with Jew-Hatred could watch this piece of shit without demanding “PROOF”. 

Climate-Science The Other Faith-Based Discipline
I am on the Concerned Scientists e-mail list.  Mostly I delete without opening.  But today I opened it.  I am now concerned, and annoyed enough to opine.  

How is it that the predictions of doom made twenty years ago, predictions premised on insufficient curtailment of CO2 release, have not come about?  It is twenty years since the first fear-mongering began. 

A “concerned scientist” must first be a scientist, yes?  And when scientists are caught having cherry-picked data and found to be conspiring with one another to spin their findings to fit a predetermined desired conclusion, that is a career-ending scandal.  Or, it would be at least in Science-sciences. 

Why do the “Climate-Scientists” have different criteria?  It appears to me that the loudest mavens of Doom have the weakest scientific credentials.  Climate Science (I will forgo the quotes, with difficulty) seems to lack the expected integration of Physics-Scientists, Biochemistry- Scientists or any of the “hard” science-sciences.  In addition even the less mathematically rigorous fields of Paleontology-Science and Archaeology-Science appear to not have been tapped for their inputs either. 

Climate-Scientists determine what Climate-Science is.  Climate-Scientists accredit other Climate-Scientists.  In none of the science-sciences are Public Relations, and Computer Modeling entry majors.  In fact I believe that Climate Science stands alone as an undergrad major.  Unlike Scientist-scientists who waste their undergrad years earning a general Bachelor of Science with perhaps a minor in a Particular Science-Science, “concerned” students major in Climate Science. 

One wonders why a student, by definition not educated enough to speak to the validity of Climate Science chooses such a course of study.  If “faith is belief in things unseen” is the choice to major in Climate Science a leap of faith? 

Though I would wager all my worldly goods that a Venn diagram of the union of the sets: Believers In Climate-Science, and Believers in Intelligent Design have a vanishingly minuscule overlap, they share the faith-based nature of their ‘science’.  (How long can I holdback the quotes?  Surely not forever?)  Strange.  Concerning even. 
Yeah porcupine I’m concoyned *eye-jab* Curly.